netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/8] netfilter: header compilation fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:36:57 +0100
From:   Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@...zel.net>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Net Dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/8] netfilter: header compilation fixes

On 2019-08-13, at 12:14:03 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:04:24AM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > On 2019-08-13, at 11:55:29 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > Would you mind if - before pushing this out - I do this string
> > > replacement for the patch subject?
> > >
> > > s/added/add
> > > s/removed/remove
> > > s/inlined/inline
> > >
> > > I was told present tense is preferred for description. Otherwise, I'll
> > > leave them as is.
> >
> > I adopted past tenses because at the point at which one is reading
> > the description of a commit, one is usually reading about old
> > behaviour and what has been done to change it.  However, I wasn't
> > aware that there was a preference and I am happy to switch to the
> > present tense instead, so by all means feel free to change them.
>
> This is not in the Documentation tree, or I could not find this in a
> quick git grep:
>
> https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy
>
> "In patch descriptions and in the subject, it is common and preferable
> to use present-tense, imperative language. Write as if you are telling
> git what to do with your patch."
>
> I remember though that maintainers have been asking for this in the
> past.

Thanks for the pointer.

J.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)