netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change formatting of the condenced output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:00:24 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change formatting
 of the condenced output

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:47 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This makes it visually simpler to follow the output.
> Also, highlight with red color failures when outputting to tty.
>
> Before:
>   #1 attach_probe:FAIL
>   #2 bpf_obj_id:OK
>   #3/1 bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o:OK
>   #3/2 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o:OK
>   #3/3 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o:OK
>   #3/4 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o:OK
>   #3/5 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o:OK
>   #3/6 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o:OK
>   #3/7 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o:OK
>   #3/8 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o:OK
>   #3/9 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o:OK
>   #3/10 bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o:OK
>   #3/11 bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o:OK
>   #3/12 bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o:OK
>   #3/13 bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o:OK
>   #3/14 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o:OK
>   #3/15 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o:OK
>   #3/16 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o:OK
>   #3/17 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o:OK
>   #3/18 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o:OK
>   #3/19 bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o:OK
>   #3/20 bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o:OK
>   #3 bpf_verif_scale:OK
>   #4 flow_dissector:OK
>
> After:
>   #  1     FAIL attach_probe
>   #  2       OK bpf_obj_id
>   #  3/1     OK bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o
>   #  3/2     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o
>   #  3/3     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o
>   #  3/4     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o
>   #  3/5     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o
>   #  3/6     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o
>   #  3/7     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o
>   #  3/8     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o
>   #  3/9     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o
>   #  3/10    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o
>   #  3/11    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o
>   #  3/12    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o
>   #  3/13    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o
>   #  3/14    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o
>   #  3/15    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o
>   #  3/16    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o
>   #  3/17    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o
>   #  3/18    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o
>   #  3/19    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o
>   #  3/20    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o
>   #  3       OK bpf_verif_scale
>   #  4       OK flow_dissector

sorry this is nack.
I prefer consistency with test_verifier output.