lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:07:48 -0700
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change
 formatting of the condenced output

On 08/14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:47 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This makes it visually simpler to follow the output.
> > Also, highlight with red color failures when outputting to tty.
> >
> > Before:
> >   #1 attach_probe:FAIL
> >   #2 bpf_obj_id:OK
> >   #3/1 bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o:OK
> >   #3/2 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o:OK
> >   #3/3 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o:OK
> >   #3/4 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o:OK
> >   #3/5 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o:OK
> >   #3/6 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o:OK
> >   #3/7 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o:OK
> >   #3/8 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o:OK
> >   #3/9 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o:OK
> >   #3/10 bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o:OK
> >   #3/11 bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o:OK
> >   #3/12 bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o:OK
> >   #3/13 bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o:OK
> >   #3/14 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o:OK
> >   #3/15 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o:OK
> >   #3/16 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o:OK
> >   #3/17 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o:OK
> >   #3/18 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o:OK
> >   #3/19 bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o:OK
> >   #3/20 bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o:OK
> >   #3 bpf_verif_scale:OK
> >   #4 flow_dissector:OK
> >
> > After:
> >   #  1     FAIL attach_probe
> >   #  2       OK bpf_obj_id
> >   #  3/1     OK bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o
> >   #  3/2     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o
> >   #  3/3     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o
> >   #  3/4     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o
> >   #  3/5     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o
> >   #  3/6     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o
> >   #  3/7     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o
> >   #  3/8     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o
> >   #  3/9     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o
> >   #  3/10    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o
> >   #  3/11    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o
> >   #  3/12    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o
> >   #  3/13    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o
> >   #  3/14    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o
> >   #  3/15    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o
> >   #  3/16    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o
> >   #  3/17    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o
> >   #  3/18    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o
> >   #  3/19    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o
> >   #  3/20    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o
> >   #  3       OK bpf_verif_scale
> >   #  4       OK flow_dissector
> 
> sorry this is nack.
> I prefer consistency with test_verifier output.
No problem, let me know how you feel about the other patches
in the series, can drop this one.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ