[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814170748.GK2820@mini-arch>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:07:48 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change
formatting of the condenced output
On 08/14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:47 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This makes it visually simpler to follow the output.
> > Also, highlight with red color failures when outputting to tty.
> >
> > Before:
> > #1 attach_probe:FAIL
> > #2 bpf_obj_id:OK
> > #3/1 bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o:OK
> > #3/2 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o:OK
> > #3/3 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o:OK
> > #3/4 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o:OK
> > #3/5 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o:OK
> > #3/6 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o:OK
> > #3/7 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o:OK
> > #3/8 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o:OK
> > #3/9 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o:OK
> > #3/10 bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o:OK
> > #3/11 bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o:OK
> > #3/12 bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o:OK
> > #3/13 bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o:OK
> > #3/14 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o:OK
> > #3/15 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o:OK
> > #3/16 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o:OK
> > #3/17 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o:OK
> > #3/18 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o:OK
> > #3/19 bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o:OK
> > #3/20 bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o:OK
> > #3 bpf_verif_scale:OK
> > #4 flow_dissector:OK
> >
> > After:
> > # 1 FAIL attach_probe
> > # 2 OK bpf_obj_id
> > # 3/1 OK bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o
> > # 3/2 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o
> > # 3/3 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o
> > # 3/4 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o
> > # 3/5 OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o
> > # 3/6 OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o
> > # 3/7 OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o
> > # 3/8 OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o
> > # 3/9 OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o
> > # 3/10 OK bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o
> > # 3/11 OK bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o
> > # 3/12 OK bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o
> > # 3/13 OK bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o
> > # 3/14 OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o
> > # 3/15 OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o
> > # 3/16 OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o
> > # 3/17 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o
> > # 3/18 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o
> > # 3/19 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o
> > # 3/20 OK bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o
> > # 3 OK bpf_verif_scale
> > # 4 OK flow_dissector
>
> sorry this is nack.
> I prefer consistency with test_verifier output.
No problem, let me know how you feel about the other patches
in the series, can drop this one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists