lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe103dee-bba8-1e0d-83b2-f91c2c37089d@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:23:55 +0200
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tunnel: fix dev null pointer dereference when send
 pkg larger than mtu in collect_md mode



On 8/16/19 5:24 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:16:58AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
>>> index 38c02bb62e2c..c6713c7287df 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
>>> @@ -597,6 +597,9 @@ void ip_md_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>>  		goto tx_error;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	if (skb_dst(skb) && !skb_dst(skb)->dev)
>>> +		skb_dst(skb)->dev = rt->dst.dev;
>>> +
>>
>>
>> IMO this looks wrong.
>> This dst seems shared. 
> 
> If the dst is shared, it may cause some problem. Could you point me where the
> dst may be shared possibly?
>

dst are inherently shared.

This is why we have a refcount on them.

Only when the dst has been allocated by the current thread we can make changes on them.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ