Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:58:51 +0300
From:   Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@...sung.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp

On 20.08.2019 18:35, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:18 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@...sung.com> wrote:
>>
>> Tx code doesn't clear the descriptor status after cleaning.
>> So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some
>> descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move
>> prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the comletion queue ring.
>>
>> Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number
>> of used descriptors in the tx ring.
>>
>> Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support")
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@...sung.com>
> 
> I'm not sure this is the best way to go. My preference would be to
> have something in the ring that would prevent us from racing which I
> don't think this really addresses. I am pretty sure this code is safe
> on x86 but I would be worried about weak ordered systems such as
> PowerPC.
> 
> It might make sense to look at adding the eop_desc logic like we have
> in the regular path with a proper barrier before we write it and after
> we read it. So for example we could hold of on writing the bytecount
> value until the end of an iteration and call smp_wmb before we write
> it. Then on the cleanup we could read it and if it is non-zero we take
> an smp_rmb before proceeding further to process the Tx descriptor and
> clearing the value. Otherwise this code is going to just keep popping
> up with issues.

But, unlike regular case, xdp zero-copy xmit and clean for particular
tx ring always happens in the same NAPI context and even on the same
CPU core.

I saw the 'eop_desc' manipulations in regular case and yes, we could
use 'next_to_watch' field just as a flag of descriptor existence,
but it seems unnecessarily complicated. Am I missing something?

> 
>> ---
>>
>> Not tested yet because of lack of available hardware.
>> So, testing is very welcome.
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h      | 10 ++++++++++
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 12 +-----------
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c  |  6 ++++--
>>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>> index 39e73ad60352..0befcef46e80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
>> @@ -512,6 +512,16 @@ static inline u16 ixgbe_desc_unused(struct ixgbe_ring *ring)
>>         return ((ntc > ntu) ? 0 : ring->count) + ntc - ntu - 1;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline u64 ixgbe_desc_used(struct ixgbe_ring *ring)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int head, tail;
>> +
>> +       head = ring->next_to_clean;
>> +       tail = ring->next_to_use;
>> +
>> +       return ((head <= tail) ? tail : tail + ring->count) - head;
>> +}
>> +
>>  #define IXGBE_RX_DESC(R, i)        \
>>         (&(((union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i]))
>>  #define IXGBE_TX_DESC(R, i)        \
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> index 7882148abb43..d417237857d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> @@ -1012,21 +1012,11 @@ static u64 ixgbe_get_tx_completed(struct ixgbe_ring *ring)
>>         return ring->stats.packets;
>>  }
>>
>> -static u64 ixgbe_get_tx_pending(struct ixgbe_ring *ring)
>> -{
>> -       unsigned int head, tail;
>> -
>> -       head = ring->next_to_clean;
>> -       tail = ring->next_to_use;
>> -
>> -       return ((head <= tail) ? tail : tail + ring->count) - head;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static inline bool ixgbe_check_tx_hang(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring)
>>  {
>>         u32 tx_done = ixgbe_get_tx_completed(tx_ring);
>>         u32 tx_done_old = tx_ring->tx_stats.tx_done_old;
>> -       u32 tx_pending = ixgbe_get_tx_pending(tx_ring);
>> +       u32 tx_pending = ixgbe_desc_used(tx_ring);
>>
>>         clear_check_for_tx_hang(tx_ring);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
>> index 6b609553329f..7702efed356a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
>> @@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
>>         u32 i = tx_ring->next_to_clean, xsk_frames = 0;
>>         unsigned int budget = q_vector->tx.work_limit;
>>         struct xdp_umem *umem = tx_ring->xsk_umem;
>> +       u32 used_descs = ixgbe_desc_used(tx_ring);
>>         union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc;
>>         struct ixgbe_tx_buffer *tx_bi;
>>         bool xmit_done;
>> @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
>>         tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i);
>>         i -= tx_ring->count;
>>
>> -       do {
>> +       while (likely(budget && used_descs)) {
>>                 if (!(tx_desc->wb.status & cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD)))
>>                         break;
>>
>> @@ -673,7 +674,8 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
>>
>>                 /* update budget accounting */
>>                 budget--;
>> -       } while (likely(budget));
>> +               used_descs--;
>> +       }
>>
>>         i += tx_ring->count;
>>         tx_ring->next_to_clean = i;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists