lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8a00a98-74eb-9f8d-660f-c2ea159dec91@solarflare.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:00:26 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:     <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        <jiri@...nulli.us>, <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: flow_offload: mangle 128-bit packet
 field with one action

On 20/08/2019 15:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> It looks to me this limitation is coming from tc pedit.
>
> Four actions to mangle an IPv6 address consume more memory when making
> the translation, and if you expect a lot of rules.
Your change means that now every pedit uses four hw entries, even if it
 was only meant to be a 32-bit mangle.  Host memory used to keep track of
 the pedit actions is cheap, hw entries in pedit tables are not.  Nor is
 driver implementation complexity.
NAK.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ