[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190821140815.GA1447@localhost>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 07:08:15 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Hubert Feurstein <h.feurstein@...il.com>, mlichvar@...hat.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH spi for-5.4 0/5] Deterministic SPI latency with NXP DSPI
driver
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:38:45PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Overall, the PTP switch use case is well supported by Linux. The
> synchronization of the management CPU to the PTP, while nice to have,
> is not required to implement a Transparent Clock. Your specific
> application might require it, but honestly, if the management CPU
> needs good synchronization, then you really aught to feed a PPS from
> the switch into a gpio (for example) on the CPU.
Another way to achieve this is to have a second MAC interface on the
management CPU connected to a spare port on the switch. Then time
stamping, PHC, ptp4l, and phc2sys work as expected.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists