lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSz1_KA1tCJtNjwK26BOkGhKGbPT7v1O82mWPduvWwd4A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:00:09 -0400 From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org Subject: New skb extension for use by LSMs (skb "security blob")? Hello netdev, I was just made aware of the skb extension work, and it looks very appealing from a LSM perspective. As some of you probably remember, we (the LSM folks) have wanted a proper security blob in the skb for quite some time, but netdev has been resistant to this idea thus far. If I were to propose a patchset to add a SKB_EXT_SECURITY skb extension (a single extension ID to be shared among the different LSMs), would that be something that netdev would consider merging, or is there still a philosophical objection to things like this? -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists