netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Multi-CPU DSA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190825060810.181f65c9@nic.cz>
Date:   Sun, 25 Aug 2019 06:08:10 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Multi-CPU DSA support

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:01:21 +0200
Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz> wrote:

> the documentation would became weird to users.
... would become weird ...
> 
> We are *already* using the iflink property to report which CPU device
> is used as CPU destination port for a given switch slave interface. So
> why to use that for changing this, also?
... why NOT to use that for chaning this also?
> 
> If you think that iflink should not be used for this, and other agree,
... and others agree with you,