[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190825061953.6c5c43b7@nic.cz>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 06:19:53 +0200
From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Multi-CPU DSA support
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:24:07 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> That is a new idea. Interesting.
>
> I would like to look around and see what else uses this "lan1@...0"
> concept. We need to ensure it is not counter intuitive in general,
> when you consider all possible users.
There are not many users of ndo_get_iflink besides DSA slave:
ip6_gre, ip6_vti, sit, ip6_tunnel
ip_gte, ip_vti, ipmr, ipip,
macsec, macvlan, veth
ipvlan
ipoib
and a few other. What these have in common is that all these interfaces
are linked somehow to another interfacem, ie. a macvlan interface eth0.1
is linked to it's master interface eth0. All of these are virtual
interfaces.
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists