[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190825131535.Horde.K3HRnOFcIiu-aVdXmqwndlD@www.vdorst.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 13:15:35 +0000
From: René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK
and add support for port 5
Hi Russell,
Quoting Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:45:44PM +0200, René van Dorst wrote:
>> 1. net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK API
>> This patch converts mt7530 to PHYLINK API.
>> 2. dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
>> 3. net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
>> These 2 patches adding support for port 5 of the switch.
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> * Mostly phylink improvements after review.
>> rfc -> v1:
>> * Mostly phylink improvements after review.
>> * Drop phy isolation patches. Adds no value for now.
>> René van Dorst (3):
>> net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK API
>> dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
>> net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mt7530.txt | 218 ++++++++++
>> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 371 +++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 61 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 577 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> Having looked through this set of patches, I don't see anything
> from the phylink point of view that concerns me. So, for the
> series from the phylink perspective:
>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks and thanks for reviewing.
Greats,
René
>
> Thanks.
>
> I did notice a dev_info() in patch 3 that you may like to consider
> whether they should be printed at info level or debug level. You
> may keep my ack on the patch when fixing that.
>
> I haven't considered whether the patch passes davem's style
> requirements for networking code; what I spotted did look like
> the declarations were upside-down christmas tree.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists