[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPpJ_efAxQN4pRdpVmT5Pdkp-6Y-QVOQdJR4iY4A-PXZokLGtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:45:50 +0800
From: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@...lessm.com" <linux@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft IRQ
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> 於 2019年9月2日 週一 下午8:18寫道:
>
> Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com> writes:
>
> >> From: Jian-Hong Pan
> >> Subject: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft IRQ
> >>
> >> There is a mass of jobs between spin lock and unlock in the hardware
> >> IRQ which will occupy much time originally. To make system work more
> >> efficiently, this patch moves the jobs to the soft IRQ (bottom half) to
> >> reduce the time in hardware IRQ.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> >
> > Now it works fine with MSI interrupt enabled.
> >
> > But this patch is conflicting with MSI interrupt patch.
> > Is there a better way we can make Kalle apply them more smoothly?
> > I can rebase them and submit both if you're OK.
The rebase work is appreciated.
Thank you,
Jian-Hong Pan
> Yeah, submitting all the MSI patches in the same patchset is the easiest
> approach. That way they apply cleanly to wireless-drivers-next.
>
> --
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists