[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18C363B@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:18:47 +0000
From: Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@...lessm.com" <linux@...lessm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft IRQ
> From: Jian-Hong Pan [mailto:jian-hong@...lessm.com]
>
> >
> > Tony Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com> writes:
> >
> > >> From: Jian-Hong Pan
> > >> Subject: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft
> IRQ
> > >>
> > >> There is a mass of jobs between spin lock and unlock in the hardware
> > >> IRQ which will occupy much time originally. To make system work more
> > >> efficiently, this patch moves the jobs to the soft IRQ (bottom half) to
> > >> reduce the time in hardware IRQ.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> > >
> > > Now it works fine with MSI interrupt enabled.
> > >
> > > But this patch is conflicting with MSI interrupt patch.
> > > Is there a better way we can make Kalle apply them more smoothly?
> > > I can rebase them and submit both if you're OK.
>
> The rebase work is appreciated.
>
Rebased and sent. Please check it and see if I've done anything wrong :)
https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11127453/
Thanks,
Yan-Hsuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists