netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: modify rtl8152_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18DACE1@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:36:53 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: modify rtl8152_set_speed function

Heiner Kallweit [mailto:hkallweit1@...il.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 2:14 PM
[...]
> >> Seeing all this code it might be a good idea to switch this driver
> >> to phylib, similar to what I did with r8169 some time ago.
> >
> > It is too complex to be completed for me at the moment.
> > If this patch is unacceptable, I would submit other
> > patches first. Thanks.
> >
> My remark isn't directly related to your patch and wasn't
> meant as an immediate ToDo. It's just a hint, because I think
> using phylib could help to significantly simplify the driver.

I would schedule this in my work. Maybe I finish submitting
the other patches later.

Besides, I have a question. I think I don't need rtl8152_set_speed()
if I implement phylib. However, I need to record some information
according to the settings of speed. For now, I do it in rtl8152_set_speed().
Do you have any idea about how I should do it with phylib without
rtl8152_set_speed()?

Best Regards,
Hayes