netdev - Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:25:26 +0800
From:   Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Yang Guo <guoyang2@...wei.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in
 ip_idents_reserve()"

Hi Eric,

On 2019/7/26 17:58, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/26/19 11:17 AM, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
>> From: Yang Guo <guoyang2@...wei.com>
>>
>> There is an significant performance regression with the following
>> commit-id <adb03115f459>
>> ("net: get rid of an signed integer overflow in ip_idents_reserve()").
>>
>>
> 
> So, you jump around and took ownership of this issue, while some of us
> are already working on it ?
> 

Any update about this issue?

Thanks,
Shaokun

> Have you first checked that current UBSAN versions will not complain anymore ?
> 
> A revert adding back the original issue would be silly, performance of
> benchmarks is nice but secondary.
> 
> 
>