lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB3266850280A788D41C277B08D3B60@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:32:38 +0000
From:   Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: stmmac: Only enable enhanced
 addressing mode when needed

From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Date: Sep/09/2019, 20:11:27 (UTC+00:00)

> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:07:04PM +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> > Date: Sep/09/2019, 16:25:45 (UTC+00:00)
> > 
> > > @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct stmmac_dma_cfg {
> > >  	int fixed_burst;
> > >  	int mixed_burst;
> > >  	bool aal;
> > > +	bool eame;
> > 
> > bools should not be used in struct's, please change to int.
> 
> Huh? Since when? "aal" right above it is also bool. Can you provide a
> specific rationale for why we shouldn't use bool in structs?

Please see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384.

---
Thanks,
Jose 
Miguel Abreu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ