netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: features to handle network storms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190911113148.GB1435@t480s.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:31:48 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To:     Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, bob.beckett@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: features to handle network
 storms

Hi Robert,

On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:46:05 +0100, Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com> wrote:
> > Feature series targeting netdev must be prefixed "PATCH net-next". As
> 
> Thanks for the info. Out of curiosity, where should I have gleaned this
> info from? This is my first contribution to netdev, so I wasnt familiar
> with the etiquette.
> 
> > this approach was a PoC, sending it as "RFC net-next" would be even
> > more
> > appropriate.

Netdev being a huge subsystem has specific rules for subject prefix or merge
window, which are described in Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst


Thank you,

	Vivien