[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190916194502.0c014667@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:45:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
<pkshih@...ltek.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfp: Drop unnecessary continue in
nfp_net_pf_alloc_vnics
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:46:23 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> Continue is not needed at the bottom of a loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> index 986464d..68db47d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,8 @@ static void nfp_net_pf_free_vnics(struct nfp_pf *pf)
> ctrl_bar += NFP_PF_CSR_SLICE_SIZE;
>
> /* Kill the vNIC if app init marked it as invalid */
> - if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID) {
> + if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID)
> nfp_net_pf_free_vnic(pf, nn);
> - continue;
> - }
Ugh, I already nack at least one patch like this, this continue makes
the _intent_ of the code more clear, the compiler will ignore it anyway.
I guess there's no use in fighting the bots..
> }
>
> if (list_empty(&pf->vnics))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists