netdev - Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f71e9773-5cfb-f20b-956f-d98b11a5d4a7@gmx.de>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:56:16 +0200
From:   Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To:     John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
        Arlie Davis <arlied@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c)

On 18.09.19 00:51, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2019-09-17 5:36 p.m., Arlie Davis wrote:
>> Likewise, I'm at a loss for testing with real hardware. It's hard to
>> find such things, now.
> How does de2104x compare to ds2142/43?  I have a c3750 with ds2142/43 tulip.  Helge
> or some others might have a machine with a de2104x.

The machines we could test are
* a C240 with a DS21140 tulip chip (Sven has one),
* a C3000 or similiar with DS21142 and/or DS21143 (me).

If the patch does not show any regressions, I'd suggest to
apply it upstream.

Helge