netdev - Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190918132736.GA9231@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:27:36 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:     John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
        Arlie Davis <arlied@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c)

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 18.09.19 00:51, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On 2019-09-17 5:36 p.m., Arlie Davis wrote:
> >> Likewise, I'm at a loss for testing with real hardware. It's hard to
> >> find such things, now.
> > How does de2104x compare to ds2142/43?  I have a c3750 with ds2142/43 tulip.  Helge
> > or some others might have a machine with a de2104x.
> 
> The machines we could test are
> * a C240 with a DS21140 tulip chip (Sven has one),
> * a C3000 or similiar with DS21142 and/or DS21143 (me).
> 
> If the patch does not show any regressions, I'd suggest to
> apply it upstream.

2114x chips use a different driver, so it won't help here.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]