[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5D8199EF.8050402@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:43:59 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
CC: <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<anna.schumaker@...app.com>, <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ixgbe: Use memzero_explicit directly in crypto
cases
On 2019/9/18 10:36, zhong jiang wrote:
> In general, Use kzfree() to replace memset() + kfree() is feasible and
> resonable. But It's btter to use memzero_explicit() to replace memset()
> in crypto cases.
s/btter/better/, will repost. sorry for that.
Thanks,
zhong jiang
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> index 113f608..7e4f32f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> @@ -960,9 +960,11 @@ int ixgbe_ipsec_vf_add_sa(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
> return 0;
>
> err_aead:
> - kzfree(xs->aead);
> + memzero_explicit(xs->aead, sizeof(*xs->aead));
> + kfree(xs->aead);
> err_xs:
> - kzfree(xs);
> + memzero_explicit(xs, sizeof(*xs));
> + kfree(xs);
> err_out:
> msgbuf[1] = err;
> return err;
> @@ -1047,7 +1049,8 @@ int ixgbe_ipsec_vf_del_sa(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
> ixgbe_ipsec_del_sa(xs);
>
> /* remove the xs that was made-up in the add request */
> - kzfree(xs);
> + memzero_explicit(xs, sizeof(*xs));
> + kfree(xs);
>
> return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists