netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: do not free rt if FIB_LOOKUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190924.153008.1663682877890370513.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Jason@...c4.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: do not free rt if FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF is set on
 suppress rule

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:55:04 +0200

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 2:53 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> Please make such test cases integratabe into the selftests area for networking
>> and submit it along with this fix.
> 
> That link is for a WireGuard test-case. When we get that upstream,
> those will all live in selftests/ all the same as you'd like. For now,
> it's running for every kernel on https://build.wireguard.com/ which in
> turn runs for every new commit.

I'm asking you to make a non-wireguard test that triggers the problem.

Or would you like a situation you're interested in to break from time
to time.

Jason, please don't be difficult about this and write a proper test
case just like I would ask anyone else fixing bugs like this to write.

Thank you.