netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: do not free rt if FIB_LOOKUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9oL7qP=pGnXRT1hmPmRpQ1_0r__vHkuBe-LbfgZTEMV_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:49:59 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: do not free rt if FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF is set on
 suppress rule

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 3:30 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote
> I'm asking you to make a non-wireguard test that triggers the problem.
Oh, gotcha. No problem.

>
> Or would you like a situation you're interested in to break from time
> to time.
My test suite should catch it in the future now that it's there, so I'm fine.

> Jason, please don't be difficult about this and write a proper test
> case just like I would ask anyone else fixing bugs like this to write.
I'm not being difficult. I just thought you didn't see what the test
case I linked to actually was. I have no qualms about reimplementing
it with the dummy interface, for a v2 of this patch. Coming your way
shortly.