netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf] samples/bpf: kbuild: add CONFIG_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbZxa3iGZEWB03rdL+7ErmhdpB0e3aeOQvbLPu0o8XFqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:16:31 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] samples/bpf: kbuild: add CONFIG_SAMPLE_BPF Kconfig

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:52 AM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 12:37, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:28 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 01:14, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > > > >On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 03:49, Masahiro Yamada
> > > > ><yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >[...]
> > > > >> > Yes, the BPF samples require clang/LLVM with BPF support to build. Any
> > > > >> > suggestion on a good way to address this (missing tools), better than
> > > > >> > the warning above? After the commit 394053f4a4b3 ("kbuild: make single
> > > > >> > targets work more correctly"), it's no longer possible to build
> > > > >> > samples/bpf without support in the samples/Makefile.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You can with
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "make M=samples/bpf"
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >Oh, I didn't know that. Does M= support "output" builds (O=)?
> >
> > No.
> > O= points to the output directory of vmlinux,
> > not of the external module.
> >
> > You cannot put the build artifacts from samples/bpf/
> > in a separate directory.
> >
>
> Hmm, I can't even get "make M=samples/bpf/" to build. Am I missing
> something obvious?

There were 3 or 4 separate fixes submitted for samples/bpf yesterday,
maybe you are hitting some of those issues. Try to pull latest (not
sure if bpf or bpf-next tree). I tried make M=samples/bpf and it
worked for me.

>
> Prior 394053f4a4b3 "make samples/bpf/" and "make O=/foo/bar
> samples/bpf/" worked, but I guess I can live with that...
>
>
> Thanks!
> Björn
>
>
> >
> >
> > > > >I usually just build samples/bpf/ with:
> > > > >
> > > > >  $ make V=1 O=/home/foo/build/bleh samples/bpf/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Björn
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't README be updated?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, the M= variant doesn't work at all for me. The build is still
> > > broken for me. Maybe I'm missing anything obvious...
> > >
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ivan Khoronzhuk
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Masahiro Yamada