lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b74af81-d12d-6abd-fd4f-5c1e758fdde7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:10:04 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, rajendra.dendukuri@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: Handle race in addrconf_dad_work

On 10/2/19 4:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This might be related to a use of a bonding device, with a mlx4 slave.
> 

does it only happen with bonds?

bond shows IF_READY even though the underlying device is carrier down
which seems wrong; if a lower device is not carrier up then DAD does not
really happen.

A quick test with a VM (and setting carrier off on the tap) shows that
with the current patch in place the bond address stays in tentative
state. Reverting this patch and the tentative flag is removed. DAD never
happens since carrier is off on the one link in the bond, so the
tentative flag getting cleared is wrong.

I need to step out; come back to this later.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ