lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a2a936a-9b20-be61-2301-dfe83e41e605@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:42:28 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, rajendra.dendukuri@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: Handle race in addrconf_dad_work

On 10/2/19 6:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/2/19 5:10 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 10/2/19 4:36 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> This might be related to a use of a bonding device, with a mlx4 slave.
>>>
>>
>> does it only happen with bonds?
> 
> All my hosts have bonds, some are just fine with your patch, but others are not.

I have a setup now where the bond is reliably showing tentative for the
address. Something to use to debug this weird little side effect.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ