[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza8d+O0dRZy5NkQbpA-Fnk32PhZK2wqJxJw=Ve9eYUwUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:53:49 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: add BPF_CORE_READ/BPF_CORE_READ_INTO
helpers
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:10 AM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com> wrote:
>
> On 10/7/19 11:15 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >>> +#define BPF_CORE_READ(src, a, ...) \
> >>> + ({ \
> >>> + ___type(src, a, ##__VA_ARGS__) __r; \
> >>> + BPF_CORE_READ_INTO(&__r, src, a, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> >>> + __r; \
> >>> + })
> >>> +
> >> Since we're splitting things into
> >> bpf_{helpers,helper_defs,endian,tracing}.h
> >> how about adding all core macros into bpf_core_read.h ?
> > ok, but maybe just bpf_core.h then?
>
> bpf_core.h is too generic. It either needs to be capitalized,
> which is unheard of for header files or some suffix added.
> I think bpf_core_read.h is short enough and doesn't look like
> bpf_core_write.h will be coming any time soon.
> If you're worried about _read part then may be
> bpf_core_access.h ?
>
Alright, I'll split it off into bpf_core_read.h.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists