netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/appletalk: restore success case for atalk_proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191008185741.10afd266@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 18:57:41 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Christopher KOBAYASHI <chris@...avowed.jp>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/appletalk: restore success case for
 atalk_proc_init()

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:26:30 +0900, Christopher KOBAYASHI wrote:
> Commit e2bcd8b0ce6ee3410665765db0d44dd8b7e3b348 to
> net/appletalk/atalk_proc.c removed the success case, rendering
> appletalk.ko inoperable.  This one-liner restores correct operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christopher KOBAYASHI <chris@...avowed.jp>

Thank you, the code looks correct!

Could you improve the commit message a little bit?
Could you add a Fixes tag and use the standard way of quoting commits?

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes

Once done could you send the patch again indicating this is the second
revision in the subject?

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format

> diff --git a/net/appletalk/atalk_proc.c b/net/appletalk/atalk_proc.c
> index 550c6ca007cc..9c1241292d1d 100644
> --- a/net/appletalk/atalk_proc.c
> +++ b/net/appletalk/atalk_proc.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ int __init atalk_proc_init(void)
>  				     sizeof(struct aarp_iter_state), NULL))
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	return 0;
> +
>  out:
>  	remove_proc_subtree("atalk", init_net.proc_net);
>  	return -ENOMEM;