netdev - RE: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5567905315BD6CE8F88EAFEEEC950@VI1PR04MB5567.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 05:53:58 +0000
From:   Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 7:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes
> 
> On Tue,  8 Oct 2019 15:10:21 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > Here's a series of fixes and changes for the DPAA 1.x drivers.
> > Fixing some boot time dependency issues, removing some dead code,
> > changing the buffers used for reception, fixing the DMA devices,
> > some cleanups.
> 
> Hi Madalin!
> 
> The title of this series says "DPAA fixes", are these bug fixes?
> If so they should target the net tree ([PATCH net]) and contain
> appropriate Fixes tags.
> 
> Cleanups should go into the net-next tree ([PATCH net-next]).
> 
> Please try to not post more than 15 patches in one series, it clogs
> up the review flow.
> 
> For some of those and other best practices please see:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html
> 
> :)
> 
> IMHO there is also no need at all to CC linux-kernel on networking
> patches..

Hi Jakub,

I should have added the net-next target in the subject.
I can split the (minor) fixes from the other changes.
I've added "Fixes" tags to the fix patches already.
In regards to the patch count, I can send two patch
sets but it won't reduce the total...

Regards,
Madalin