[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9a88540-6f5c-23e5-b8d2-a3836ec71858@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:59:48 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, jcfaracco@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dnmendes76@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/2] drivers: net: virtio_net: Add tx_timeout
function
On 2019/10/7 下午3:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 03:45:15PM -0300, jcfaracco@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@...il.com>
>>
>> To enable dev_watchdog, virtio_net should have a tx_timeout defined
>> (.ndo_tx_timeout). This is only a skeleton to throw a warn message. It
>> notifies the event in some specific queue of device. This function
>> still counts tx_timeout statistic and consider this event as an error
>> (one error per queue), reporting it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daiane Mendes <dnmendes76@...il.com>
>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 27f9b212c9f5..4b703b4b9441 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -2585,6 +2585,29 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void virtnet_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + u32 i;
>> +
>> + /* find the stopped queue the same way dev_watchdog() does */
> not really - the watchdog actually looks at trans_start.
>
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i];
>> +
>> + if (!netif_xmit_stopped(netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, i)))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
>> + sq->stats.tx_timeouts++;
>> + u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>> +
>> + netdev_warn(dev, "TX timeout on send queue: %d, sq: %s, vq: %d, name: %s\n",
>> + i, sq->name, sq->vq->index, sq->vq->name);
> this seems to assume any running queue is timed out.
> doesn't look right.
>
> also - there's already a warning in this case in the core. do we need another one?
>
>> + dev->stats.tx_errors++;
>
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct net_device_ops virtnet_netdev = {
>> .ndo_open = virtnet_open,
>> .ndo_stop = virtnet_close,
>> @@ -2600,6 +2623,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops virtnet_netdev = {
>> .ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
>> .ndo_get_phys_port_name = virtnet_get_phys_port_name,
>> .ndo_set_features = virtnet_set_features,
>> + .ndo_tx_timeout = virtnet_tx_timeout,
>> };
>>
>> static void virtnet_config_changed_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> @@ -3018,6 +3042,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> dev->netdev_ops = &virtnet_netdev;
>> dev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
>>
>> + /* Set up dev_watchdog cycle. */
>> + dev->watchdog_timeo = 5 * HZ;
>> +
> Seems to be still broken with napi_tx = false.
With napi_tx = false, we still have tx interrupt after we stop the queue
which looks fine I believe?
Thanks
>
>> dev->ethtool_ops = &virtnet_ethtool_ops;
>> SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &vdev->dev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists