netdev - [PATCH net] tcp: fix a possible lockdep splat in tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191014134757.185995-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 06:47:57 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] tcp: fix a possible lockdep splat in tcp_done()

syzbot found that if __inet_inherit_port() returns an error,
we call tcp_done() after inet_csk_prepare_forced_close(),
meaning the socket lock is no longer held.

We might fix this in a different way in net-next, but
for 5.4 it seems safer to relax the lockdep check.

Fixes: d983ea6f16b8 ("tcp: add rcu protection around tp->fastopen_rsk")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b2ac4f074e2da21db57923fda722b6d23f170de9..42187a3b82f4f6280d831c34d9ca6b7bcffc191f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -3842,8 +3842,12 @@ void tcp_done(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct request_sock *req;
 
-	req = rcu_dereference_protected(tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk,
-					lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
+	/* We might be called with a new socket, after
+	 * inet_csk_prepare_forced_close() has been called
+	 * so we can not use lockdep_sock_is_held(sk)
+	 */
+	req = rcu_dereference_protected(tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk, 1);
+
 	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT || sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
 		TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 
-- 
2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog