lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACwWb3CYP9MENZJAzBt5buMNxkck7+Qig9yYG8nTYrdBw1fk5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:37:46 +0200
From:   Levente <leventelist@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IPv6 test fail

Dear list,


We are testing IPv6 again against the test specification of ipv6forum.

https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols

The test house state that some certain packages doesn't arrive to the
device under test. We fail test cases

V6LC.1.2.2: No Next Header After Extension Header
V6LC.1.2.3: Unreacognized Next Header in Extension Header - End Node
V6LC.1.2.4: Extension Header Processing Order
V6LC.1.2.5: Option Processing Order
V6LC.1.2.8: Option Processing Destination Options Header

The question is that is it possible that the this is the intended way
of operation? I.e. the kernel swallows those malformed packages? We
use tcpdump to log the traffic.


Thank you for your help.

Levente

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ