netdev - Re: IPv6 test fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHapkUgCWS4DxGVL2qJsXmiAEq4rGY+sPTROx4iftO6mD_261g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:00:28 -0500
From:   Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>
To:     Levente <leventelist@...il.com>,
        Captain Wiggum <captwiggum@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 test fail

I am curious: what kernel version are you testing?
I recall that several months ago there is a thread on TAHI IPv6.
Including the person who started the thread.

Stephen.

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM Levente <leventelist@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
>
> We are testing IPv6 again against the test specification of ipv6forum.
>
> https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
>
> The test house state that some certain packages doesn't arrive to the
> device under test. We fail test cases
>
> V6LC.1.2.2: No Next Header After Extension Header
> V6LC.1.2.3: Unreacognized Next Header in Extension Header - End Node
> V6LC.1.2.4: Extension Header Processing Order
> V6LC.1.2.5: Option Processing Order
> V6LC.1.2.8: Option Processing Destination Options Header
>
> The question is that is it possible that the this is the intended way
> of operation? I.e. the kernel swallows those malformed packages? We
> use tcpdump to log the traffic.
>
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Levente