netdev - Re: IPv6 test fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB=W+o=-XEu_QZtrt6_Qt-HB4CUH+4nUs1o02tVFqJJkdi_bhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:31:20 -0700
From:   Captain Wiggum <captwiggum@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>
Cc:     Levente <leventelist@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 test fail

(resending without html.:)
I started the thread.
We are using 4.19.x and 4.9.x, but for reference I also tested then current 5.x.
I believe we got it all worked out at the time.
--John Masinter


On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:00 PM Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I am curious: what kernel version are you testing?
> I recall that several months ago there is a thread on TAHI IPv6.
> Including the person who started the thread.
>
> Stephen.
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM Levente <leventelist@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> >
> > We are testing IPv6 again against the test specification of ipv6forum.
> >
> > https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
> >
> > The test house state that some certain packages doesn't arrive to the
> > device under test. We fail test cases
> >
> > V6LC.1.2.2: No Next Header After Extension Header
> > V6LC.1.2.3: Unreacognized Next Header in Extension Header - End Node
> > V6LC.1.2.4: Extension Header Processing Order
> > V6LC.1.2.5: Option Processing Order
> > V6LC.1.2.8: Option Processing Destination Options Header
> >
> > The question is that is it possible that the this is the intended way
> > of operation? I.e. the kernel swallows those malformed packages? We
> > use tcpdump to log the traffic.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your help.
> >
> > Levente