[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191024103134.GD13225@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:31:34 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Vehlow <lkml@...coder.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] xfrm : lock input tasklet skb queue
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:22:04PM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> On PREEMPT_RT_FULL while running netperf, a corruption
> of the skb queue causes an oops.
>
> This appears to be caused by a race condition here
> __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
> tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
> Where the queue is changed before the tasklet is locked by
> tasklet_schedule.
>
> The fix is to use the skb queue lock.
>
> This is the original work of Joerg Vehlow <joerg.vehlow@...-tech.de>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/111
> xfrm_input: Protect queue with lock
>
> During the skb_queue_splice_init the tasklet could have been preempted
> and __skb_queue_tail called, which led to an inconsistent queue.
>
> ifdefs for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL added to reduce runtime effects
> on the normal kernel.
Has Herbert commented on your initial patch, please
fix PREEMPT_RT_FULL instead. There are certainly many
more codepaths that take such assumptions. You can not
fix this by distributing a spin_lock_irqsave here
and there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists