lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa035bcc-88ef-5bc2-96ae-46b05987b0dd@solarflare.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:44:30 +0100
From:   Charles McLachlan <cmclachlan@...arflare.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] sfc: support encapsulation of xdp_frames in
 efx_tx_buffer.

On 22/10/2019 23:19, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>> index 65e81ec1b314..9905e8952a45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tx.c
>> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static void efx_dequeue_buffer(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue,
>>  		netif_vdbg(tx_queue->efx, tx_done, tx_queue->efx->net_dev,
>>  			   "TX queue %d transmission id %x complete\n",
>>  			   tx_queue->queue, tx_queue->read_count);
>> +	} else if (buffer->flags & EFX_TX_BUF_XDP) {
>> +		xdp_return_frame(buffer->xdpf);
> 
> Is this efx_dequeue_buffer() function always called under NAPI protection?
> (So it could use the faster xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() ... ?)

Yes, it *is* always called from NAPI, so I've changed it to use xdp_return_frame_rx_napi. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ