[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7e239ba-2461-4f8d-7dd7-0f557ac7f4bf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:54:55 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.daly@...el.com,
cunming.liang@...el.com, zhihong.wang@...el.com,
lingshan.zhu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vhost: introduce mdev based hardware backend
On 2019/10/24 下午6:42, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
>
>> And we should try to avoid
>> putting ctrl vq and Rx/Tx vqs in the same DMA space to prevent
>> guests having the chance to bypass the host (e.g. QEMU) to
>> setup the backend accelerator directly.
>
>
> That's really good point. So when "vhost" type is created, parent
> should assume addr of ctrl_vq is hva.
>
> Thanks
This works for vhost but not virtio since there's no way for virtio
kernel driver to differ ctrl_vq with the rest when doing DMA map. One
possible solution is to provide DMA domain isolation between virtqueues.
Then ctrl vq can use its dedicated DMA domain for the work.
Anyway, this could be done in the future. We can have a version first
that doesn't support ctrl_vq.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists