netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 06/12] net: ethernet: ti: introduce cpsw switchdev based driver part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191101203913.GD31534@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 21:39:13 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 06/12] net: ethernet: ti: introduce cpsw
 switchdev based driver part 1 - dual-emac

> > > +static const struct devlink_ops cpsw_devlink_ops;
> > 
> > It would be nice to avoid this forward declaration.
> 
> It's not declaration, it's definition of devlink_ops without any standard callbacks implemented.

Ho Grygorii

Ah, yes.

How about

= {
  };

to make it clearer?

> > > +static const struct devlink_param cpsw_devlink_params[] = {
> > > +	DEVLINK_PARAM_DRIVER(CPSW_DL_PARAM_ALE_BYPASS,
> > > +			     "ale_bypass", DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_BOOL,
> > > +			     BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_RUNTIME),
> > > +			     cpsw_dl_ale_ctrl_get, cpsw_dl_ale_ctrl_set, NULL),
> > > +};
> > 
> > Is this documented?
> 
> In patch 9. But I'll update it and add standard devlink parameter definition, like:
> 
> ale_bypass	[DEVICE, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> 		Allows to enable ALE_CONTROL(4).BYPASS mode for debug purposes
> 		Type: bool
> 		Configuration mode: runtime

And please you the standard file naming and location,
Documentation/networking/devlink-params-foo.txt

Thanks
	Andrew