lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a03def6-3ea0-090f-048f-877700836df2@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:34:14 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        shuah@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftest: net: add icmp reply address test

On 11/1/19 5:34 PM, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> Verify that in this scenario
> 
>                    1.0.3.1/24
> ---- 1.0.1.3/24    1.0.1.1/24 ---- 1.0.2.1/24    1.0.2.4/24 ----
> |H1|--------------------------|R1|--------------------------|H2|
> ----            N1            ----            N2            ----
> 
> where 1.0.3.1/24 and 1.0.1.1/24 are respectively R1's primary and
> secondary address on N1, traceroute from H1 to H2 show 1.0.1.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile          |   2 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/net/icmp_reply_addr.sh  | 106 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/icmp_reply_addr.sh
> 

Hi:

It would be better to combine both of these into a single test script;
the topology and setup are very similar and the scripts share a lot of
common code.

The script can be a generic traceroute.sh and then contain 2 tests:
1. IPv4 - verify reply address test,
2. IPv6 - verify reply address test.

Making 1 script with multiple tests allows other tests to be added in
the future with less overhead. This is how other tests under net are done.

Also, you still have these using macvlan devices. The intent is to use
network namespaces to mimic nodes in a network. As such veth pairs are a
better option for this intent.

There are 2 scripts under net (l2tp.sh and fcnal-test.sh) that contain
functions -- create_ns and connect_ns  -- that really reduce the
overhead of creating tests like this. Actually you could copy l2tp.sh to
traceroute.sh and quickly update it for these tests.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ