[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+HUmGgDrY9A7kz7268ycAOhExA3Y1h-QhBS6xwbWYxpUODDWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:08:40 -0700
From: Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shuah@...nel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftest: net: add icmp reply address test
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 7:34 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It would be better to combine both of these into a single test script;
> the topology and setup are very similar and the scripts share a lot of
> common code.
Sure, I can do that.
> Also, you still have these using macvlan devices. The intent is to use
> network namespaces to mimic nodes in a network. As such veth pairs are a
> better option for this intent.
>
I am only using macvlans for N1 in the ipv6 test, where there are 3 nodes.
How do I use veths for that?
Thanks,
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists