lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105005541.GP25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:55:41 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:40:16PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:40:19AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > This series switches phy drivers form using fwnode_get_named_gpiod() and
> > gpiod_get_from_of_node() that are scheduled to be removed in favor
> > of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard
> > gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software
> > nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware.
> > 
> > Linus, as David would prefer not to pull in the immutable branch but
> > rather route the patches through the tree that has the new API, could
> > you please take them with his ACKs?
> 
> Gentle ping on the series...

Given that kbuild found a build issue with patch 1, aren't we waiting
for you to produce an updated patch 1?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ