[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKdAkRQNWXjMdJ9F1Lu=8+rHWFJwoyWu6Lcc+LFesaSTz3wspg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:27:51 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:55 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 04:40:16PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:40:19AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > This series switches phy drivers form using fwnode_get_named_gpiod() and
> > > gpiod_get_from_of_node() that are scheduled to be removed in favor
> > > of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard
> > > gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software
> > > nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware.
> > >
> > > Linus, as David would prefer not to pull in the immutable branch but
> > > rather route the patches through the tree that has the new API, could
> > > you please take them with his ACKs?
> >
> > Gentle ping on the series...
>
> Given that kbuild found a build issue with patch 1, aren't we waiting
> for you to produce an updated patch 1?
No: kbuild is unable to parse instructions such as "please pull an
immutable branch" before applying the series. Linus' tree already has
needed changes.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists