[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89dcabd5a1b38e8106d70173922c391b@walle.cc>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:28:19 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] net: phy: at803x: mention AR8033 as same as AR8031
Hi Andrew,
Am 2019-11-07 13:55, schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>> I tried that actually.. There is a PTP enable bit. It's default is 1
>> (according to the AR8031 datasheet). Now guess what it's value is on
>> the AR8033.. its also 1. Not enough.. I also tried to enable the
>> realtime counter. well that worked too.
>
>> And yes. I've double checked the package marking. It definitely was
>> an AR8033. So either I was just lucky, or maybe.. the AR8033 is just
>> a relabled AR8031 ;)
>
> O.K, thanks for trying. We really only need to solve this mystery if
> anybody actually tries to make use of PTP.
That might be the next thing on my list; but depends if there is an
usable interrupt for the PHY on my board..
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists