netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mediatek: rework GDM setup flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191107.154922.1123372183066604716.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com
Cc:     sean.wang@...iatek.com, john@...ozen.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        opensource@...rst.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mediatek: rework GDM setup flow

From: MarkLee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:51:35 +0800

> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {

This is a regression, because in the existing code...

> -	for (i = 0; i < MTK_MAC_COUNT; i++) {

the proper macro is used instead of a magic constant.

You're doing so many things in one change, it's hard to review
and audit.

If you're going to consolidate code, do that only in one change.

Then make other functional changes such as putting the chip into
GDMA_DROP_ALL mode during the stop operation etc.