[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191110172237.GJ25889@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 18:22:37 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: add core phylib sfp support
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 05:08:34PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:00:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 04:40:07PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 05:13:07PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 02:23:05PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > > > Add core phylib help for supporting SFP sockets on PHYs. This provides
> > > > > a mechanism to inform the SFP layer about PHY up/down events, and also
> > > > > unregister the SFP bus when the PHY is going away.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Russell
> > > >
> > > > What does the device tree binding look like? I think you have SFP
> > > > proprieties in the PHYs node?
> > >
> > > Correct, just the same as network devices. Hmm, however, neither are
> > > documented... oh dear, it looks like I need to figure out how this
> > > yaml stuff works. :(
> >
> > Yes, that would be good. I also assume you have at least one DT patch
> > for one of the Marvell boards? Seeing that would also help.
>
> There's no need, it was already added by bootlin back in May 2018.
Ah. Lucky for them the binding works :-)
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists