[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191114132143.GB12021@chelsio.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:51:44 +0530
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nirranjan@...lsio.com,
vishal@...lsio.com, dt@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] cxgb4: add TC-MATCHALL classifier ingress
offload
On Wednesday, November 11/13/19, 2019 at 19:16:10 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:09:21 +0530, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > +static int cxgb4_matchall_alloc_filter(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls)
> > +{
> > + struct cxgb4_tc_port_matchall *tc_port_matchall;
> > + struct port_info *pi = netdev2pinfo(dev);
> > + struct adapter *adap = netdev2adap(dev);
> > + struct ch_filter_specification *fs;
> > + int ret, fidx;
> > +
> > + /* Since the rules with lower indices have higher priority, place
> > + * MATCHALL rule at the highest free index of the TCAM because
> > + * MATCHALL is usually not a high priority filter and is generally
> > + * used as a last rule, if all other rules fail.
> > + */
>
> The rule ordering in HW must match the ordering in the kernel.
>
Ok. Will maintain the same ordering as in kernel in v2.
> > + fidx = cxgb4_get_last_free_ftid(dev);
> > + if (fidx < 0)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
Thanks,
Rahul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists