[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd47f8e1ebc04fa98856ed8d89b91419@walle.cc>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:33:47 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: phy: add callback for custom
interrupt handler to struct phy_driver
Hi,
this is an old thread and I know its already applied. But I'd like to
hear your opinion on the following problem below.
> The phylib interrupt handler handles link change events only currently.
> However PHY drivers may want to use other interrupt sources too,
> e.g. to report temperature monitoring events. Therefore add a callback
> to struct phy_driver allowing PHY drivers to implement a custom
> interrupt handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 9 +++++++--
> include/linux/phy.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index d90d9863e..068f0a126 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -772,8 +772,13 @@ static irqreturn_t phy_interrupt(int irq, void
> *phy_dat)
> if (phydev->drv->did_interrupt &&
> !phydev->drv->did_interrupt(phydev))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> - /* reschedule state queue work to run as soon as possible */
> - phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
> + if (phydev->drv->handle_interrupt) {
> + if (phydev->drv->handle_interrupt(phydev))
> + goto phy_err;
There are PHYs which clears the interrupt already by reading the
interrupt status register. To do something useful in handle_interrupt()
I have to read the interrupt status register, thus clearing the pending
interrupts.
> + } else {
> + /* reschedule state queue work to run as soon as possible */
> + phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
> + }
>
> if (phy_clear_interrupt(phydev))
> goto phy_err;
But here the interrupts are cleared again, which means we might loose
interrupt causes in between.
I could think of two different fixes:
(1) handle_interrupt() has to take care to clear the interrupts and
skip the phy_clear_interrupt() above.
(2) handle_interrupt() might return a special return code which skips
the phy_clear_interrupt
TBH, I'd prefer (1) but I don't know if it is allowed to change
semantics afterwards. (Also, I've found no driver where
handle_interrupt() is actually used for now?)
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists