lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:00:42 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] ipv4: use dst hint for ipv4 list receive

On 11/19/19 7:38 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> @@ -535,11 +550,20 @@ static void ip_sublist_rcv_finish(struct list_head *head)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct sk_buff *ip_extract_route_hint(struct net *net,
> +					     struct sk_buff *skb, int rt_type)
> +{
> +	if (fib4_has_custom_rules(net) || rt_type != RTN_LOCAL)

Why the local only limitation for v4 but not v6? Really, why limit this
to LOCAL at all? same destination with same tos and no custom rules
means even for forwarding the lookup should be the same and you can
re-use the dst.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ