netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] ipv4: use dst hint for ipv4 list receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8035cdd76f22d0eef3f3921779cebf0e2033934.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:20:56 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] ipv4: use dst hint for ipv4 list receive

On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 09:00 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/19/19 7:38 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > @@ -535,11 +550,20 @@ static void ip_sublist_rcv_finish(struct list_head *head)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static struct sk_buff *ip_extract_route_hint(struct net *net,
> > +					     struct sk_buff *skb, int rt_type)
> > +{
> > +	if (fib4_has_custom_rules(net) || rt_type != RTN_LOCAL)
> 
> Why the local only limitation for v4 but not v6? Really, why limit this
> to LOCAL at all? 

The goal here was to simplify as much as possible the ipv4
ip_route_use_hint() helper, as its complexity raised some eyebrown.

Yes, hints can be used also for forwarding. I'm unsure how much will
help, given the daddr contraint. If there is agreement I can re-add it.

Thanks,

Paolo