[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191119.145048.487849503145486152.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:50:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: anders.roxell@...aro.org
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ipmr: fix suspicious RCU warning
From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:09:25 +0100
> @@ -108,9 +108,18 @@ static void igmpmsg_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
> static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, int flags);
> static void ipmr_expire_process(struct timer_list *t);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> +int ip_mr_initialized;
> +void ip_mr_now_initialized(void) { ip_mr_initialized = 1; }
> +#else
> +const int ip_mr_initialized = 1;
> +void ip_mr_now_initialized(void) { }
> +#endif
This seems excessive and a bit not so pretty.
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MROUTE_MULTIPLE_TABLES
> #define ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) \
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list)
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list, \
> + (lockdep_rtnl_is_held() || !ip_mr_initialized))
>
> static struct mr_table *ipmr_mr_table_iter(struct net *net,
> struct mr_table *mrt)
The problematic code path is ipmr_rules_init() done during ipmr_net_init().
You can just wrap this call around RCU locking or take the RTNL mutex.
That way you don't need to rediculous ip_mr_initialized knob which frankly
doesn't even seem accurate to me. It's a centralized global variable
which is holding state about multiple network namespace objects which makes
absolutely no sense at all, it's wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists